2021 has been a strong year for the pro-life cause. 2022 could be even better

[ad_1]

The pro-life cause has gone well this year.

For the first time since the Supreme Court ruled Roe vs. Wade in 1973, states adopted over 100 combined abortion restrictions; this year, states enacted 106 abortion restrictions as of September 17, according to the Guttmacher Institute. This surpassed the previous record set in 2011 when states adopted 89 new abortion restrictions.

Abortion has been illegal after six weeks of pregnancy in Texas since September, more than 30 towns across the country have banned abortion, and a Supreme Court with a 6-3 Republican majority heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization early December. The case concerns a 15-week abortion ban in Mississippi from 2018 that never went into effect.

While this year has seen some positive developments, next year could be even better.

State governments have made the passage of pro-life laws a higher priority than in previous sessions. They still have a lot of work to do, even with Roe vs. Wade in place, to defend the unborn child. And luckily, the Supreme Court can give them a chance to do even more for the unborn child. The Supreme Court will rule on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization at some point next year. At a minimum, it’s reasonable to think he can maintain the ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, but these courts could also overturn Roe vs. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, returning the abortion law to the states.

Either of these results would give states more opportunity to protect the unborn child by limiting abortion, although overturning the two previous Supreme Court rulings would be much better than changing the Allowed gestation limit of five weeks, since about 90% of abortions take place in the first trimester (12 weeks or earlier). In addition to current Texas law, the first limit for abortion in some states in the United States is 20 weeks.

Meanwhile, if the court cancels Roe vs. Wade, states could ban abortion, pass heart rate bills, restrict abortion earlier in the first or second trimester, and more. The threshold for abortion would vary greatly from state to state, but it would be an improvement over the current situation. In addition, if the courts set aside Planned Parenthood v. Casey, states could enact spousal notification laws that require an abortion provider to notify a woman’s husband if she decides to have an abortion. Additionally, states could further regulate the industry, including requiring clinics to have admitting privileges to nearby hospitals.

As states make greater strides for the pro-life cause, they should also focus on demand and the cultural aspects of the problem as well as supply.

Items such as increased access to birth control, a child allowance, increased funding for pregnancy crisis centers and reduced cost of living could contribute to demand, while ensuring that abortion fanatics such as Planned Parenthood and Youth advocates out-of-school sex education programs could help culturally.

While 2022 could be a good year for pro-lifers, the fight to protect life will be far from over. The pro-life cause should not be satisfied with one good Supreme Court decision.

Tom Joyce (@TomJoyceSports) is a political journalist for the New Boston Post in Massachusetts. He is also a freelance writer who has been published in USA today, the Boston Globe, Press day, ESPN, on Detroit Free Press, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Federalist, and a number of other outlets.


[ad_2]
Source link

Comments are closed.