Sex blog – I Videos Gratis http://ivideosgratis.org/ Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:48:25 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://ivideosgratis.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/icon-3-150x150.png Sex blog – I Videos Gratis http://ivideosgratis.org/ 32 32 Blog: The First Legal Challenge to California’s Gender Diversity Law Goes to Court | Cooley LLP https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp-2/ https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp-2/#respond Fri, 01 Oct 2021 18:38:20 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp-2/ You may remember that the first legal challenge to California’s gender diversity law, Crest vs. Alex Padilla, was a 2019 lawsuit filed in a California state court by three California taxpayers seeking to prevent the implementation and enforcement of the law. Presented as a “taxpayer lawsuit,” the litigation sought to bar Alex Padilla, then California […]]]>

You may remember that the first legal challenge to California’s gender diversity law, Crest vs. Alex Padilla, was a 2019 lawsuit filed in a California state court by three California taxpayers seeking to prevent the implementation and enforcement of the law. Presented as a “taxpayer lawsuit,” the litigation sought to bar Alex Padilla, then California Secretary of State (now US Senator), from spending taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources to enforce or enforce. enforces the law, SB 826, alleging that the mandate of the law is an unconstitutional quota based on gender and violates the California constitution. The court in this case has just dismissed each party’s motion for summary judgment after concluding that there were matters of material fact that could be adjudicated. The case will now go to trial, which is currently set for October 25. Stay tuned.

Even supporters of the California law recognized the possibility of “equal protection” claims and other legal challenges – when Gov. Jerry Brown enacted the bill, he acknowledged that “serious legal concerns” had been raised. . (See this post from PubCo.) And many expected a flood of legal challenges to thwart efforts to implement the bill. Nonetheless, California companies appear to have accepted the requirements of the legal mandate – perhaps also feeling pressure from large asset managers such as BlackRock and State Street – and have not filed a complaint.

SB 826 requires public companies (defined as companies listed on major US stock exchanges) with principal executive offices located in California, no matter where they are incorporated, include a specified number of women on their boards. Each public company was to have at least one woman on its board by the end of 2019. This minimum increases to two by December 31, 2021 – not too far – if the company has five directors, and to three women. directors if the company has six or more directors. The law also requires the California Secretary of State’s office to post reports on the status of compliance with the law on its website. Under the law, the secretary can impose fines for violations, ranging from $ 100,000 to $ 300,000 per violation. To date, the Secretary has neither proposed nor adopted any regulations regarding fines or imposed fines for violations.

In the litigation, the plaintiffs claim “taxpayer” status under the “California Taxpayer Common Law Doctrine and Section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure, which grants California taxpayers the right to sue representatives of the government to prevent illegal spending of taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources. ”They argue that in so-called“ taxpayer procedures ”it is“ irrelevant whether the amount of the expenditure is small or whether the ban illegal spending saves tax funds. ”In addition, they argue, the Assembly Appropriations Committee indicated that SB 826 would require“ ongoing General Fund costs of approximately $ 500,000 each year for that the Secretary of State develop regulations, investigate claims and enforce violations of the provisions of the law and unknown additional costs to produce e annual report required.

In the complaint, the complainants argue that the law’s requirement for the representation of women on boards of directors “employs express gender classifications. As a result, SB 826 is immediately suspect and presumed invalid “under the equal protection provisions of the California Constitution and subject to” scrutiny “by the California courts. The complaint seeks the entry of a judgment declaring illegal any expenditure of taxpayer funds to implement or enforce SB 826 and the issuance of an injunction permanently prohibiting the secretary from spending taxpayer funds to enforce or enforce. implement the provisions of the legislation.

There are of course several other ongoing legal challenges against SB 826, as well as its related legislation, AB 979, which requires boards of directors of public companies, including foreign companies headquartered in California , to include a specified number of directors from “under-represented communities”. The same three plaintiffs in this case also filed a similar lawsuit challenging AB 979 on essentially the same basis. As Crest vs. Padilla I, the case is touted as a “taxpayer lawsuit” and seeks to direct the California Secretary of State to spend taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources to administer or enforce the law, alleging that the mandate of the law is an unconstitutional quota and violates the California constitution. (See this post from PubCo.)

In Creighton Meland v. Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State, filed in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of California, a shareholder of a Delaware corporation that is incorporated and headquartered in California filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that the law was unconstitutional under the equal protection provisions of the 14th Amendment and permanent injunction preventing the implementation and enforcement of the law. The applicant claims that the law is a classification based on sex which violates the equal protection provisions of the 14e Amendment by imposing a quota based on sex directly on shareholders and seeking to force shareholders to perpetuate discrimination based on sex. Specifically, the complaint argues that the law “discriminates on the face on the basis of sex” and “does not serve any important government interest” because “[s]ex-based balancing is not a significant government interest that can support a classification based on gender under the equal protection clause. In April 2020, a federal judge dismissed this legal challenge for lack of standing. In June 2021, a panel of three judges from the 9e Circuit reversed that decision, allowing the case, now called Meland vs. Weber, Go forward. The tribunal held that, because the complainant “plausibly alleged that SB 826 compelled or encouraged him to discriminate on the basis of sex, he sufficiently alleged that he had standing to challenge the constitutionality of SB 826 ”. A district court hearing is currently scheduled in this case for Oct. 19 on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. (See this post from PubCo and this post from PubCo)

In another case, Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. Weber, the plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that the two California board of directors diversity laws violate the equal protection clause of 14e Amendment and doctrine of internal affairs. The case has been filed in California Federal District Court against California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber and seeks to bar Weber from enforcing those laws. The plaintiff is described as “a Texas nonprofit membership association,” with members including “individuals seeking employment as corporate directors as well as shareholders of publicly traded companies headquartered in in California and therefore subject to SB 826 and AB 979 standards ”. According to the complaint, these laws require all publicly traded companies headquartered in California to discriminate on the basis of gender and race when selecting members of their board of directors. The complaint alleges that “[t]These laws are unconstitutional and patronizing social engineering. The legal regime they institute builds on and perpetuates outrageous racial categories and gender stereotypes that the US legal system has rightly rejected. Further, the Complainant argues that the two laws “violate the sovereign rights of other states to regulate corporate governance for entities incorporated under their laws. SB 826 and AB 979 apply to all companies headquartered in California, even if the company in question is incorporated under the laws of another state. This policy is illegal because California does not have jurisdiction to regulate the internal affairs of entities incorporated under the laws of other states. (See this post from PubCoNotably, that same group has filed a slim Exchange Act petition with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for a review of the SEC’s final order approving the board’s diversity rule. of the Nasdaq. (See this post from PubCo.)

[View source.]


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp-2/feed/ 0
Blog: The First Legal Challenge to California’s Gender Diversity Law Goes to Court | Cooley LLP https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp/ https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp/#respond Fri, 01 Oct 2021 18:38:20 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp/ You may remember that the first legal challenge to California’s gender diversity law, Crest vs. Alex Padilla, was a 2019 lawsuit filed in a California state court by three California taxpayers seeking to prevent the implementation and enforcement of the law. Presented as a “taxpayer lawsuit,” the litigation sought to bar Alex Padilla, then California […]]]>

You may remember that the first legal challenge to California’s gender diversity law, Crest vs. Alex Padilla, was a 2019 lawsuit filed in a California state court by three California taxpayers seeking to prevent the implementation and enforcement of the law. Presented as a “taxpayer lawsuit,” the litigation sought to bar Alex Padilla, then California Secretary of State (now US Senator), from spending taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources to enforce or enforce. enforces the law, SB 826, alleging that the mandate of the law is an unconstitutional quota based on gender and violates the California constitution. The court in this case has just dismissed each party’s motion for summary judgment after concluding that there were matters of material fact that could be adjudicated. The case will now go to trial, which is currently set for October 25. Stay tuned.

Even supporters of the California law recognized the possibility of “equal protection” claims and other legal challenges – when Gov. Jerry Brown enacted the bill, he acknowledged that “serious legal concerns” had been raised. . (See this post from PubCo.) And many expected a flood of legal challenges to thwart efforts to implement the bill. Nonetheless, California companies appear to have accepted the requirements of the legal mandate – perhaps also feeling pressure from large asset managers such as BlackRock and State Street – and have not filed a complaint.

SB 826 requires public companies (defined as companies listed on major US stock exchanges) with principal executive offices located in California, no matter where they are incorporated, include a specified number of women on their boards. Each public company was to have at least one woman on its board by the end of 2019. This minimum increases to two by December 31, 2021 – not too far – if the company has five directors, and to three women. directors if the company has six or more directors. The law also requires the California Secretary of State’s office to post reports on the status of compliance with the law on its website. Under the law, the secretary can impose fines for violations, ranging from $ 100,000 to $ 300,000 per violation. To date, the Secretary has neither proposed nor adopted any regulations regarding fines or imposed fines for violations.

In the litigation, the plaintiffs claim “taxpayer” status under the “California Taxpayer Common Law Doctrine and Section 526a of the Code of Civil Procedure, which grants California taxpayers the right to sue representatives of the government to prevent illegal spending of taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources. ”They argue that in so-called“ taxpayer procedures ”it is“ irrelevant whether the amount of the expenditure is small or whether the ban illegal spending saves tax funds. ”In addition, they argue, the Assembly Appropriations Committee indicated that SB 826 would require“ ongoing General Fund costs of approximately $ 500,000 each year for that the Secretary of State develop regulations, investigate claims and enforce violations of the provisions of the law and unknown additional costs to produce e annual report required.

In the complaint, the complainants argue that the law’s requirement for the representation of women on boards of directors “employs express gender classifications. As a result, SB 826 is immediately suspect and presumed invalid “under the equal protection provisions of the California Constitution and subject to” scrutiny “by the California courts. The complaint seeks the entry of a judgment declaring illegal any expenditure of taxpayer funds to implement or enforce SB 826 and the issuance of an injunction permanently prohibiting the secretary from spending taxpayer funds to enforce or enforce. implement the provisions of the legislation.

There are of course several other ongoing legal challenges against SB 826, as well as its related legislation, AB 979, which requires boards of directors of public companies, including foreign companies headquartered in California , to include a specified number of directors from “under-represented communities”. The same three plaintiffs in this case also filed a similar lawsuit challenging AB 979 on essentially the same basis. As Crest vs. Padilla I, the case is touted as a “taxpayer lawsuit” and seeks to direct the California Secretary of State to spend taxpayer funds and taxpayer-funded resources to administer or enforce the law, alleging that the mandate of the law is an unconstitutional quota and violates the California constitution. (See this post from PubCo.)

In Creighton Meland v. Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State, filed in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of California, a shareholder of a Delaware corporation that is incorporated and headquartered in California filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that the law was unconstitutional under the equal protection provisions of the 14th Amendment and permanent injunction preventing the implementation and enforcement of the law. The applicant claims that the law is a classification based on sex which violates the equal protection provisions of the 14e Amendment by imposing a quota based on sex directly on shareholders and seeking to force shareholders to perpetuate discrimination based on sex. Specifically, the complaint argues that the law “discriminates on the face on the basis of sex” and “does not serve any important government interest” because “[s]ex-based balancing is not a significant government interest that can support a classification based on gender under the equal protection clause. In April 2020, a federal judge dismissed this legal challenge for lack of standing. In June 2021, a panel of three judges from the 9e Circuit reversed that decision, allowing the case, now called Meland vs. Weber, Go forward. The tribunal held that, because the complainant “plausibly alleged that SB 826 compelled or encouraged him to discriminate on the basis of sex, he sufficiently alleged that he had standing to challenge the constitutionality of SB 826 ”. A district court hearing is currently scheduled in this case for Oct. 19 on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. (See this post from PubCo and this post from PubCo)

In another case, Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. Weber, the plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that the two California board of directors diversity laws violate the equal protection clause of 14e Amendment and doctrine of internal affairs. The case has been filed in California Federal District Court against California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber and seeks to bar Weber from enforcing those laws. The plaintiff is described as “a Texas nonprofit membership association,” with members including “individuals seeking employment as corporate directors as well as shareholders of publicly traded companies headquartered in in California and therefore subject to SB 826 and AB 979 standards ”. According to the complaint, these laws require all publicly traded companies headquartered in California to discriminate on the basis of gender and race when selecting members of their board of directors. The complaint alleges that “[t]These laws are unconstitutional and patronizing social engineering. The legal regime they institute builds on and perpetuates outrageous racial categories and gender stereotypes that the US legal system has rightly rejected. Further, the Complainant argues that the two laws “violate the sovereign rights of other states to regulate corporate governance for entities incorporated under their laws. SB 826 and AB 979 apply to all companies headquartered in California, even if the company in question is incorporated under the laws of another state. This policy is illegal because California does not have jurisdiction to regulate the internal affairs of entities incorporated under the laws of other states. (See this post from PubCoNotably, that same group has filed a slim Exchange Act petition with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for a review of the SEC’s final order approving the board’s diversity rule. of the Nasdaq. (See this post from PubCo.)

[View source.]


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/blog-the-first-legal-challenge-to-californias-gender-diversity-law-goes-to-court-cooley-llp/feed/ 0
Kirkham man jailed for historic sex offenses while serving as Boy Scout https://ivideosgratis.org/kirkham-man-jailed-for-historic-sex-offenses-while-serving-as-boy-scout/ https://ivideosgratis.org/kirkham-man-jailed-for-historic-sex-offenses-while-serving-as-boy-scout/#respond Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:28:00 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/kirkham-man-jailed-for-historic-sex-offenses-while-serving-as-boy-scout/ Aaron Blake A sex offender who abused three boys as a boy scout club leader in the 1980s has been jailed. Advertising Aaron Blake, now 69, was arrested in December 2018 after telling someone he hoped to play Santa Claus in local schools. Knowing that Blake had previously been convicted as a sex offender, they […]]]>
Aaron Blake

A sex offender who abused three boys as a boy scout club leader in the 1980s has been jailed.









Advertising

Aaron Blake, now 69, was arrested in December 2018 after telling someone he hoped to play Santa Claus in local schools.

Knowing that Blake had previously been convicted as a sex offender, they called the police who arrested him.

While one of his victims had already filed a complaint with the police in November, Blake’s arrest a month later then led to the identification of two other victims.

Read more: Police appeal after teenager sexually assaulted woman in her 60s in Bamber Bridge

All of the victims were boys aged seven to 12 at the time of the offense which took place in the Chorley area where Blake was a Cub leader.

Blake, of Crofts Close, Kirkham, changed his plea on the second day of his trial to admit one count of indecency and three counts of indecent assault involving his three victims.

He appeared at Preston Crown Court yesterday (Monday September 27) where he was jailed for five years and two months.

He also received an indefinite sexual harm prevention order.

Blake was jailed for 9 months in 1996 for indecent assault on a 12-year-old boy.

In 2011, he was convicted of taking indecent photographs of children and received a community order.

Read more: Preston Police want to talk to this man about student residence burglary

Lancashire Police Op Fervent Investigating Officer Simon Morris said: ‘Blake abused these young boys for several years and deprived them of their innocence to satisfy his own depraved sexual desires.

“His conviction and sentence is justice for them and I commend them for their bravery in coming forward and facing their abuser throughout the legal process. They behaved with dignity throughout this investigation.

‘Lancashire Police remain committed to investigating allegations of this nature, regardless of their history and regardless of the role, position and status of the alleged offender, and we encourage anyone who is the victim of a sexual offense to come forward. safely. knowing that they will be treated with sensitivity and professionalism.

See what’s happening near you by entering your zip code below or visit InYourArea

Read more: See the latest news and headlines from Preston


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/kirkham-man-jailed-for-historic-sex-offenses-while-serving-as-boy-scout/feed/ 0
Performer8 Review: Male Enhancement Supplement For Men Worth Buying? – Blog https://ivideosgratis.org/performer8-review-male-enhancement-supplement-for-men-worth-buying-blog/ https://ivideosgratis.org/performer8-review-male-enhancement-supplement-for-men-worth-buying-blog/#respond Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:32:45 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/?p=336 If you’re a man and you’re dealing with sexual performance issues, there’s no need to worry. Lots of men deal with this issue, but they don’t know how to approach it. Or some men might feel embarrassed about going to the doctor or talking to their partner about it. This should not be the case- […]]]>

If you’re a man and you’re dealing with sexual performance issues, there’s no need to worry. Lots of men deal with this issue, but they don’t know how to approach it. Or some men might feel embarrassed about going to the doctor or talking to their partner about it.

This should not be the case- men should feel confident in tackling any sexual performance issues they are facing. One way to do this is by looking into natural health supplements that may help with male sexual performance.

One such supplement is called Performer8, and it’s helped thousands of men. Could you be next? Let’s read on and discover more about this supplement.

Who Should Use Performer8? 

Men who are having trouble in the bedroom should consider the use of Performer8. If you just can’t seem to enjoy sex like you used to, it might be time to consider this natural supplement. Men aged 18 and up struggling with getting and maintaining an erection can try this supplement.

Understand that erectile dysfunction- the inability to keep or maintain an erection- is very common. According to Urology Health, this condition affects 30 million men.

From time to time, this can happen to guys, and it’s nothing to worry about. But if it keeps on happening, you might wish to consider a natural testosterone boosting supplement such as this one to help you along.

Some of the risk factors associated with erectile dysfunction may come about as a result of health problems, mental health, or a combination of the two.

Here are some risk factors associated with ED: 

  • Being over the age of 50
  • Having diabetes/ high blood sugar
  • High blood pressure
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Lack of exercise
  • Obesity
  • Smoking
  • Drug use
  • Drinking too much alcohol
  • High cholesterol

Remember, ED is not limited to middle to older-age men. Some older men remain functional in terms of their sexuality into their octogenarian years! So, it’s going to be important that you find out what’s causing the ED- although we stand by the efficacy of Performer8, only a doctor can help you figure out the root cause.

Click here to visit the official website of Performer8

Performer8: Brand Overview 

The Performer8 brand is a new one, having just started in 2020. That being said, they have already started to gain a following from satisfied men and their partners. The website for Performer8 is loaded with reviews from guys and even a few women, all expressing joy about what it did for them.

Performer8 was created to address the many aspects of erectile dysfunction, not just the fact that blood doesn’t always flow where it needs to.

The creators noticed the same thing many of you out there probably did: that the supplements currently for sale were either A) way too expensive, B) required a prescription, or C) was of poor quality and sold on shady websites.

The creators of Performer8 got to work and consulted with the world’s top researchers in men’s health and thus created an herbal formula. This special formula contains nine natural ingredients that work in tandem to help men feel their best in and out of the bedroom.

The secret behind the formula is to take it consistently. This way, the ingredients build up in your body and work together to help you feel more sexually charged, more confident, and more energetic.

The company insists that only high-quality ingredients are used and that they have been tested time and time again to ensure their efficacy.

And the company also takes your privacy seriously. While ED is nothing for men to be ashamed of, this company is tops when it comes to knowing that discretion matters.

All of your shipments will be sent to you in plain, unmarked packaging. No company names or trademarks are on the outside. If you purchase this using a shared credit card, it simply shows up as “P8” on the statement.

Most important of all, the brand prides itself on safety. When combing through the FAQs, one of them was, “Is Performer8 Safe?” The answer is yes. You won’t get hooked on the formula or feel out of control while using this supplement.

Pros

  • Come with natural ingredients that you don’t have to worry about. They don’t cause negative side effects.
  • Based on our research and reading of customer reviews, the formula itself has not been shown to cause any negative side effects.
  • The supplement comes with a money-back guarantee in case it doesn’t work as you hoped.
  • You don’t need a prescription or a doctor’s recommendation to purchase this supplement.
  • It’s sold over the internet and delivered discreetly to your door.
  • The formula is free of soy and GMOs, so you’re safe if you are allergic to soy.
  • You can get discounts by purchasing the formula in bulk
  • Payment options are available via Sezzle interest-free financing
  • Free eBooks included designed to help with your overall wellness

Cons

  • The formula is rather expensive.
  • The smallest option available is 90 capsules.

Ingredients 

This is a compound that occurs naturally and helps in the protection of blood vessels as well as the reduction of oxidative stress. You may find this ingredient in your favorite energy drinks as it is thought to be an energy booster. It may also boost your athletic performance, so incorporate regular exercise into your lifestyle.

Sometimes called maritime pine; this bark may help with blood flow and athletic performance. According to Medline Plus, athletes who took the extract for 8 weeks while training for a physical fitness assessment or triathlon performed better. So not only could you feel better working out, but you can last longer in the bedroom thanks to this ingredient.

The grape seed extract is capable of naturally boosting our body’s ability to manufacture nitric oxide. This is a chemical that we make naturally, and it opens up our blood vessels and thus makes it easier to become erect. Therefore, taking the extract of grape seed may be effective in stopping erectile issues in guys dealing with ED.

The name might be a little funny, but the results are serious. This is a natural booster for libido and contains a special flavonoid known as icariin. This prevents an enzyme known as PDE5 known to deflate erections from working. It’s also ideal for naturally improving one’s blood flow.

This is an herbal extract used often as a booster for sexual performance; used in Panax Ginseng is helpful for better sexual satisfaction, penetration, and erectile function.

This is a Peruvian herb used for hundreds of years to boost libido and strength. Maca is known for its ability to boost energy levels, reduce ED symptoms and raise stamina.

  • Ferrous Bisglycinate 12 mg

This is a form of iron that is easier for our bodies to digest in comparison to a regular iron. It is supportive of healthy blood flow and may help guys get and maintain an erection that lasts long.

Sometimes known as “potency wood,” this addition improves your blood flow so that it is easier to get and keep an erection. It’s a natural way to boost your libido, therefore improving your sexual appetite. In a study involving rodents, it was successful in reducing erectile dysfunction when combined with other herbs.

  • KSM-66 Ashwagandha 500 mg

This is a proprietary form of ashwagandha that is proven to boost free T count, improve your desire for sex, and bring down stress and anxiety levels. It helps to even out your hormone levels also. It’s an overall sexual health booster.

Click here to know more about the ingredients of Performer8

How Does Performer8 Work? 

By now, you might be ready to buy Performer8, but you’d like to see what it can actually do for you. No worries, we’ve got it all right here.

  • Gets Your Head in The Game

The natural ingredients of Performer8 are perfect for helping you stay focused and excited about sex- there will be no mind-wandering here.  During sex, sometimes our minds wander.

This stuff could help you stay focused on the task at hand, which is making your partner and you feel fantastic. The herbal blend of Performer8 is designed to help men focus during sex, helping them to enjoy the moment and feel comfortable with the experience all around.

  • It Can Offer More Girth, More Hardness

 When you don’t get enough blood in your penis, you don’t have as good of an erection. The ingredients of Performer8 are loaded with potent herbal ingredients that are known to bring sufficient blood to the penis and keep it there so you can enjoy harder longer-lasting erections.

  • It May Create More Volume and Mobility for Sperm

 The ingredients of Performer8 may help you increase your volume of sperm, as well as its mobility. This is great news for men who would like to start a family with their partners.

  • It Could Bring Confidence and Excitement

Don’t shy away from sex with your partner- instead, get excited about it. Performer8 is a natural health supplement that could bring you confidence about your ability to perform, both in and out of the bedroom.

And you might still be feeling skeptical about this formula, and that’s OK! We know that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of male enhancement formulas out there. Some of them work better than others, and unfortunately, some guys get burned buying ineffective supplements.

However, this is one we are confident will deliver the results you want. The ingredients are clinically studied; after all, we’ve even got studies you can read for each of the ingredients.

Another thing to note is that Performer8 also offers a money-back guarantee, so if it doesn’t work the way you want, you can always get a refund.

Benefits of Using Performer8 

Curious about what makes Performer8 worth your hard-earned dollars? Keep reading to see some of the benefits associated with using this all-natural supplement.

Performer8 is all-natural and works in 8 different ways to boost men’s sexual performance. The blend was crafted by scientists, dietitians, and researchers familiar with what men need to be at their best.

The natural, science-backed ingredients in the blend may help guys everywhere boost their sexual confidence, increase libido levels, increase fertility, and build stamina.

  • You’ll Likely Have Greater Stamina

Performer8 is made to help you bypass that low-endurance, low-stamina feeling you might be experiencing while in the bedroom. This will keep you focused on sex, focused on making your partner and yourself feel great, and do so for a satisfactory length of time.

  • Your Desire for Sex May Increase

Having a low libido is more common than you think, and it affects men and their partners negatively. So, we must fix it! Performer8 contains powerful natural aphrodisiacs that could help you increase that libido, enjoy a greater sexual appetite, and feel excited and ready for sex.

Low levels of testosterone aren’t good for males trying to enjoy sexual intercourse and their partners. It’s common among middle-aged and older men but can happen to guys of any age. To increase T-Levels naturally, try out Performer8; it has what you need to boost and maintain consistent testosterone levels.

  • Could Help Prevent Premature Ejaculation

Climbing early can be annoying and embarrassing for some guys, but rest assured it happens to almost all guys, and there’s nothing to be ashamed of.

That being said, you can help yourself last longer and keep your erections up for a greater length of time. One thing to try is Performer8, whose natural ingredients help bring blood to the penis and greater stamina to the men taking it.

Side Effects 

  • Men may experience greater energy levels, more stamina during sex, and longer-lasting, firmer erections.
  • Men may feel more confident in themselves.
  • If older guys take it, they may feel young again due to the increased sexual stamina and confidence.
  • Your wallet won’t become thin due to constantly buying supplements (the bottles start at 90-count)

As you can see, we’ve mainly listed benefits here, not side effects. This is because, in our research, we didn’t find any negative side effects associated with taking Performer8. It’s found to be relatively safe, thanks to the hours of research the founders put into creating the product.

None of the reviews we skimmed over or websites we visited mentioned anything about negative side effects.

The formula is created to be “just right,” and provides you the correct dose of each ingredient, so you get exactly what you need- nothing more, nothing less.

After you get done reading our article, go read for yourself customer reviews. They’ve tolerated the formula well and haven’t reported negative side effects.

The only individuals that should talk to their doctor first before taking are men who are on prescription medication or men who are suffering from severe ED. You would not want the supplement to interfere with any prescription medicine you need.

Who Should Refrain from Performer8? 

Although we stand by Performer8 as a great natural male health supplement, a few men should avoid taking this and instead consult with a doctor for best results.

For starters, this supplement is for mild to moderate ED. If your ED is caused by stress, anxiety, or another ailment, it’s best to talk to your doctor about ways to improve your sexual health.

This supplement is excellent, but if your ED is caused by an issue with mental health, only a trained therapist can help you overcome this barrier. There’s no shame in getting help if something is bothering you- the truth is, your spouse or romantic partner will be happy you’re getting it.

Second, if you’re taking prescription medication, but you refuse to talk to your doctor first about this, you shouldn’t do it. Again, we get it- talking about ED with a doctor can be embarrassing and a hassle. But if this supplement were to have an interaction with a medication you’re currently taking and make you feel sick or unwell, you’d regret not asking first.

Lastly, you should be willing to adopt a healthier lifestyle with these capsules. As you’ll see in the included free eBook, eating clean and getting regular exercise will help you make the most of these capsules. So, find a way to incorporate movement and wholesome foods into your life.

Dosage & Tips to Start 

The great news about Performer8 capsules is that they are easy to swallow. All it takes is a glass of water, and you’ll be on your way to swallowing these pills easily.

Performer8 capsules are designed to be taken when it works for you. The manufacturer suggests that you take them with a meal, but you can do it on an empty stomach if you prefer. This makes it great for guys who don’t have time to eat breakfast in the morning or who fast intermittently during the day due to health or personal reasons.

The ingredients found in this capsule are powerful, but they won’t mess with your digestive system and make you feel nauseated if you eat them on an empty stomach. So, feel free to take them when you want.

You will want to take only the recommended dosage of capsules, which is three. Don’t think that by taking more than the recommended dosage, you will speed up results faster. You have to give these ingredients time to build up within your body and work in tandem with one another.

Patience is a virtue, especially with Performer8. Giving this stuff the time it needs to build up and work could help you have the thicker, fuller, and stronger erections you want, plus greater amounts of stamina.

If you end up buying the second or third-tier bundling packages, you will get a helpful eBook that offers men tips and advice about what else they can do to keep their erections long and strong.

Our advice? Follow the tips; they offer ideas for healthy foods to eat, practices you can do at home to last longer in bed, and five big erection-killing errors that men make and what they can do to steer clear of said mistakes. It’s all the “hacks” you want in one easy PDF!

Where to Buy Performer8 and Guarantees?

The ideal place to get your bottles of top-quality Performer8 is on the Performer8 website. There, you will find the genuine article for sale- buying it anywhere else might result in you getting a fake product.

At the Performer8 website, you will find bundling deals available to you. Here’s what you can expect to pay:

1-month supply: $65

3-month supply: $130/includes free eBook

6-Month Supply: $195/ includes free eBook

The prices are not cheap for this supplement, and we understand that especially in the difficult times we are in. But thankfully, the shipping is fast and free, and you can also use Sezzle to pay for your Performer-8 purchase over time.

The owners of Performer8 are confident that they are selling you a product you can count on. You can buy with confidence because they offer a 100% money-back, no-questions-asked, hassle-free return policy.

Bear in mind it’s unlikely you’ll have to send them back- the Performer8 site indicates that only 2% of men who try it return the product. So, even if you think you’re an outlier, just give it a try. There’s nothing to lose.

=> Click here to get the best deals on Performer8

Click here to visit the official website of Performer8 

Conclusion 

We stand by Performer8 as being one of the best male enhancement supplements on the market. Even though it’s new to the game, it’s already becoming a favorite among guys who just need a little shove in the right direction.

Don’t feel ashamed or embarrassed if your libido is low or you’re not getting the erections you want- grab the bull by the horns and check out Performer8. These capsules could be what you need to bring that spark right back and get the flames roaring again.

What are you waiting for? The shipping is discreet, the price is fair, and there’s a money-back guarantee. So go get your supplement today and get ready to feel like yourself again.


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/performer8-review-male-enhancement-supplement-for-men-worth-buying-blog/feed/ 0
Missouri Teacher Resigns After Parents Complain About Inclusive Classroom Decorations https://ivideosgratis.org/missouri-teacher-resigns-after-parents-complain-about-inclusive-classroom-decorations/ Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:27:33 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/?p=294 click to enlarge STEVEN DUONG John Wallis in a file photo. John Wallis looked at his return to his hometown to teach as an opportunity to provide a safe space he says was […]]]>

click to enlarge

  • STEVEN DUONG
  • John Wallis in a file photo.

John Wallis looked at his return to his hometown to teach as an opportunity to provide a safe space he says was missing when he went to school. As he decorated his classroom at Neosho Junior High School, he hung up two signs above his white board that read “Everyone is Welcome Here” with the background having the progressive pride flag. On the bookshelf sat a rainbow flag.

That was enough to trigger a parent complaint, and ultimately, Wallis’ resignation.




In what Wallis tells the RFT, the flags and signs did not go against the school’s policy — he says he was advised against putting the decorations up, but not explicitly told to not hang the signs and flag. He says he never acknowledged the fact that he is gay to his students unless they personally asked him.


Instead, he told the kids that the room represented pieces of him — including a shrine to President Jimmy Carter to represent his fandom — and that the room was a safe space for students to come to him about any issues they may face. The signs were meant to show everyone was respected in his classroom, no matter what they believe. He said his first few days as a teacher were fantastic.


When he was called to a meeting with the principal after a great start to his year, Wallis was told a parent complained about the flag and signs, and said Wallis was going to “teach the kids to be gay.”


Wallis taught speech and debate, along with a theater and a world mythology class.


The conversation between the principal, assistant principal and Wallis was described as frustrating by Wallis. In those conversations, Wallis says the principal said that if they allowed him to have a pride flag, they had to allow other teachers to display Confederate flags.


“Which, first of all, they’re not at all the same thing,” Wallis adds. “One’s about me as a human, one is about you being a racist.”


He didn’t feel like the two administrators were receptive to what he was saying in his defense, and then he was instructed to take down the flag and signs. Despite the parent complaint, Wallis said he was told the meeting was “always going to happen.” He went to his classroom and did remove the decorations, but the removal not without notice from his students the next time classes were in session.


click to enlarge
A screenshot of what the poster looked like that Wallis was asked to take down. - SCREENSHOT / COURTESY JOHN WALLIS

  • Screenshot / Courtesy John Wallis
  • A screenshot of what the poster looked like that Wallis was asked to take down.

“Every hour I had at least one student ask, ‘Where are the signs? Where’s the flag?’ So, I answered honestly. I said ‘I had a meeting with the administration. I was asked to take it down.’ I then said, ‘If you thought that that flag had anything to do with this class, whichever class you’re in, that was a message that was misconstrued, I apologize,’” Wallis says. “And then I said, ‘But if you do have a problem with that flag representing me, you should find another class because I can’t change who I am.’”

This triggered three or four more parent complaints, Wallis said. He added that the parents called the superintendent, saying Wallis was “pushing an agenda.” Wallis was then asked to a meeting with the superintendent and building principal and asked to sign a letter addressed directly to him.


“Our classrooms cannot become a personal platform for pushing one’s personal agenda,” the letter obtained by RFT reads. “If you are unable to present the curriculum in a manner that keeps your personal agenda on sexuality out of your narrative and the classroom discussions, we will ultimately terminate your employment.”


The letter also said Wallis was not allowed to make additional references to “sexuality or gender” or have conversations about those topics.


click to enlarge
A photo of the letter Wallis was asked to sign in his meeting with administrators. - COURTESY JOHN WALLIS

  • Courtesy John Wallis
  • A photo of the letter Wallis was asked to sign in his meeting with administrators.

The letter was signed by Neosho School District’s superintendent Jim Cummins. Wallis was instructed to sign the letter and was given a copy to keep for himself. When asked by the RFT if he faced termination if he didn’t sign the letter, he says it was unclear.

“They didn’t explicitly say they were going to terminate me if I didn’t sign the letter,” Wallis says. “But, it was very clear that I was not leaving that room until I signed it.”


After he signed the letter, Wallis was left with a lot of questions: could he talk to students if they came to him about an issue with their sexuality? Would he be able to teach pieces of his curriculum now that he was barred from topics regarding human sexuality and gender identity?


He counted five students that were members of the LGBTQ+ community that approached him after his class to thank him for putting up the flag and signs, saying they wouldn’t know who to turn to if he didn’t have the decorations up. Would he be fired for comforting those students in times of need?


“I signed that letter because I felt forced to sign that letter,” Wallis says. “If any of those students wanted to have a conversation about that and someone heard me talking about it, I could have been fired because I was trying to help a student feel like they belong. That was just ridiculous to me.”


That was enough uncertainty, coupled with what he felt was now a hostile work environment due to the disagreements he had with the administrators, for him to turn in a resignation letter the next day on September 1.


On September 2, the two administrators came to Wallis in his classroom after his classes were finished for the day and told him he would not need to stay until his agreed-upon date of September 30; he was to pack his things and leave that day.


Wallis took to social media to share his experience, receiving support on Twitter from Missouri House Minority Leader Crystal Quade. He had nearly 200 comments on Facebook from members of the community supporting or disagreeing with him. One parent had commented he did not see how a flag and two signs “taught anyone to be gay” and that Wallis would be missed by his child.


When reached for comment by the RFT, a spokesperson provided an emailed statement from the superintendent.

“As per all personnel matters, there is a limited amount of information that is allowed to be shared by the school district,” the statement read. “In regards to inquiries regarding Mr. John Wallis, I can share that Mr. Wallis was hired on 8/13/21, and he submitted his resignation on September 1, 2021.”


The superintendent then gave a link to the district’s personnel policies.


Wallis was able to say goodbye to four of his 100 students in the halls and some of his fellow teachers as he left with tears in his eyes and arms full of boxes with his belongings in them. When he got home, he filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education.


This isn’t the first time Wallis has had problems in his hometown. In an RFT article, Wallis detailed how he was threatened by residents after organizing a Black Lives Matter protest.


Despite the problems he’s had, Wallis says he still loves Neosho and that he didn’t want people to think he hated his community. LGBTQ+ students and staff deserve to be supported, he says, and while the district is doing other great things, he thinks the way the school’s policy is worded excludes those students and staff members from being protected.


In a document on Neosho School District’s website, titled “Prohibition Against Discrimination, Harassment And Retaliation,” the policy reads that “the district strictly prohibits discrimination and harassment against employees, students or others on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, disability, age, genetic information or any other characteristic protected by law.”


In his complaint, Wallis says the form the Office of Civil Rights asks you to fill out what you want to change from the complaint. He says he wants members of the LGBTQ+ community to be explicitly mentioned in the policy so they can feel protected and seen.


He also wants a written apology from the administrators — administrators that were there when he was a student — who he said wouldn’t listen to him and stood with “stone cold faces” as he cried saying goodbye to students and teachers.


“To me, that was one of the most heartbreaking things because I thought I knew them and I really didn’t,” Wallis says. “Because when it came down to it, they believed the bigotry of that parent more than they did the teacher that they hired, the person that they hired.”


The teacher will return to St. Louis later this month, where he says he’s meant to be. Wallis will be coaching new students in speech and debate, but worries about the students he’s left behind. To him, the district has sent a clear message about their lack of support for LGBTQ+ students and staff.


Wallis said he thinks it may be hard for future educators to take the risk and put up messages of support in their classroom after what happened to him. He says he wants the students — ones he had in class and those who he didn’t get a chance to meet — to know they’re not alone, they’re accepted and loved.


“My heart breaks for them. I think I’ve cried just about every day, you know, because I can’t imagine, I don’t know what the next teacher’s gonna be like,” Wallis says. “I can’t imagine that there’s gonna be any teacher who’s gonna be willing to be like, ‘Hey, I’m a safe place,’ you know, because if you say that now there’s a target on your back and I’m worried for the teachers, I’m worried for the students. But I do hope things get better.”

Follow Jenna on Twitter at @writesjenna. Email the author at jenna@riverfronttimes.com

  • Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get the latest on the news, things to do and places to eat delivered right to your inbox.
  • Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



Source link

]]>
1st of two trials for Smith County constable begins Wednesday morning https://ivideosgratis.org/1st-of-two-trials-for-smith-county-constable-begins-wednesday-morning/ https://ivideosgratis.org/1st-of-two-trials-for-smith-county-constable-begins-wednesday-morning/#respond Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:20:57 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/?p=261 TYLER, Texas (KETK) – The trial of an East Texas constable accused of official oppression of his office began Wednesday morning in downtown Tyler. Smith County Pct. 2 Constable arrested for official oppression, prostitution just days after re-election Joshua Black is the sitting Pct. 2 Constable for Smith County and is accused of offering sexual […]]]>

TYLER, Texas (KETK) – The trial of an East Texas constable accused of official oppression of his office began Wednesday morning in downtown Tyler.

Joshua Black is the sitting Pct. 2 Constable for Smith County and is accused of offering sexual favors in exchange for free or discounted supervised visitation services to a woman named Bailey Vandergriff.

There are three potential aspects for official oppression and they are:

  • Intentionally subjecting another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful
  • Intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful
  • Intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment

Black is charged with the first aspect: mistreatment toward Vandergriff by offering the favors. Vandergriff was going through divorce proceedings and family court in Smith County directed her to have supervised visits with her daughter.

In his opening statement, Smith County prosecutor Richard Vance admitted that there were flirtations on both sides and sexually explicit messages sent by both Black and Vandergriff.

However, he said that Black is held to a higher standard as an elected law enforcement officer and that he crossed the line into illegal territory by hinting toward a “deal” between them where it appeared he would offer free supervised visits to Vandergriff in exchange for sexual favors.

Two of these visits were held at the Smith County Pct. 2 Constable’s Office.

Defense attorney Mishae Boren had a brief opening statement that said the investigation by the Texas Rangers was “one-sided” and also said, “My client is innocent.”

The witness who spent the vast majority of the day testifying was Nick Castle, the head investigator for the Texas Rangers.

Vance showed screenshots of semi-nude photographs sent by Vandergriff to Black. He does not object to the photos after asking for them. He actually asked for more, saying “I can’t see the platinum.”

A separate screenshot was shown where Black tells Vandergriff that his fee for supervised visits is $50 an hour, but for sex they would be even.

He communicated this offer partially through emojis. Castle says that he believed this met the definition of solicitation for prostitution.

Another round of texts was shown by prosecutors of Vandergriff sending a picture of several boxes of condoms asking if he had a “preference.”

Black replies saying that he heard his office would be occupied the following day and that their “deal” can happen in his Pct. 2 office later.

Vance then played a video recording of Black being interviewed by Castle nearly one year ago. When confronted about a text where Black asked for a picture from Vandergriff and to let him “feel the platinum”, he tells Castle that he can’t remember the context of that text. This answer came after a 35-second pause.

Throughout the interview, Black repeats several times that it was “inappropriate” and “stupid” but that his intention was never to imply that she must have sex with him to continue the visits.

During cross-examination by Boren, Castle admitted on the stand that there was no explicit threat made by Black where he threatened to cut off access for the supervised visits.

Castle was pressed by Boren if Vandergriff’s phone was ever forensically downloaded. He replied it had not been. She then asked if Vandergriff could have deleted messages, Castle replied: “It’s possible.”

Boren’s questioning of Castle highlighted repeatedly that the flirting was done by both sides and that Vandergriff repeatedly initiated it.

After the jury was dismissed for lunch, Judge Austin Jackson revoked the bond for Black due to him being late for court two days in a row. Black will be in the custody of deputies as the trial continues.

A live blog that was updated during the trial has been left below.


2:38 p.m.

Boren passes questioning of Castle back to prosecutor Richard Vance. Castle has been on the stand for roughly four hours.

Boren’s questioning highlighted that there was flirting on both sides and never a direct threat made by Black.

2:20 p.m.

Boren asks if there was ever a message or a conversation where Black threatened to Vandergriff that she wouldn’t be able to see her daughter unless she had sex with him.

Castle says he did not come across a message like this.

2:00 p.m.

Castle was asked by Boren if Vandergriff’s phone was ever forensically downloaded. He replied it had not been.

She then asked if Vandergriff could have deleted messages, Castle replied: “It’s possible.”

1:38 p.m.

Defense attorney Mishae Borden has begun her cross examination of Texas Rangers investigator Nick Castle.

12:20 p.m.

Prosecutor Richard Vance finishes his questioning of Ranger Castle after nearly three hours. He says that he has roughly four witnesses remaining.

After the jury was dismissed for lunch, Judge Jackson revoked Black’s bond due to him being repeatedly late to court.

12:05 p.m.

In the interview, Black repeats to Castle several times that he understands the texts look bad and that it was embarrassing.

Despite this, he says he never meant them to mean that he wanted to exchange sex as a substitute for payment.

11:55 a.m.

In a separate text, Black tells Castle that a text he sent that included an eggplant emoji and peach emoji was “flirtatious and playing.” He did admit that it was inappropriate.

11:50 a.m.

In the interview, when confronted about a text where Black asked for a picture from Vandergriff and to let him “feel the platinum”, he tells Castle that he can’t remember the context of that text. This answer came after a 35-second pause.

11:45 a.m.

In the interview from Sept. 29, 2020, Black is asked why Vandergriff might file a complaint of exchanging sexual favors for supervised visits.

Black replies that there was “jokingly flirtation” but nothing had ever happened between them. When Castle asked in the interview if any inappropriate contact had ever happened, Black said “it depends on your definition” and that it may seem like it was out of context there was, but no sexual contact had occurred.

11:30 a.m.

Castle serves Black with a search warrant for his phone, signed by now-retired Judge Christi Kennedy. While the phone was being downloaded, Castle interviewed Black. The interview was recorded and is now being played in front of the jury.

11:20 a.m.

Smith County Sheriff Larry Smith entered the courtroom and sat in the row directly in front of the media.

11:15 a.m.

A screenshot is shown by prosecutors of Vandergriff sending a picture of several boxes of condoms asking if he had a “preference.”

Black replies saying that he heard his office would be occupied the following day and that their “deal” can happen in his Pct. 2 office later.

Castle believes that this is also solicitation for prostitution.

10:50 a.m.

Judge Jackson swore in Bailey Vandergriff as a witness before bringing the jury back from break. While she was present, Black did not look up from writing on his notepad.

Vandergriff will stay out of the courtroom until she is called to testify. Castle’s testimony has resumed.

10:32 a.m.

Judge Jackson has dismissed for a 15-minute recess. Castle is still on the stand.

10:25 a.m.

Castle said that based on more than 50 pages of text message screenshots he believed that laws had been broken.

He had a second meeting with Vandergriff in September.

10:15 a.m.

Another screenshot is shown where Black appears to offer sexual favors to Vandergriff instead of cash payments for his supervised visitation business.

Castle has been on the stand for roughly one hour.

10:00 a.m.

A screenshot is shown where Black tells Vandergriff that his fee for supervised visits is $50 an hour, but for sex they would be even.

He communicates this offer partially through emojis. Castle says that he believes this meets the definition of solicitation for prostitution.

9:50 a.m.

Screenshots of semi-nude photographs sent by Vandergriff to Black. He does not object to the photos after asking for them. He actually asked for more, saying “I can’t see the platinum.”

While concerning, Castle says that the flirting was not illegal.

9:25 a.m.

Castle testifies that an investigation began in August 2020 after Bailey Vandergriff called his office. She was initially hesitant to give up Black’s name, but eventually met Castle and showed him her phone.

He confirmed that it was Josh Black’s phone number. Castle met with Black, who confirmed the phone number on Vandergriff’s device was his.

9:10 a.m.

Defense attorney Mishae Boren gives a brief, two-minute opening statement calling the Texas Rangers investigation one-sided and that her client is innocent.

Texas Ranger investigator Nick Castle is called to the stand.

9:00 a.m.

During opening statements, prosecutors reveal that Black is accused of asking for inappropriate photographs in exchange as payment for having supervised visitations for a divorced mother.

Family courts had assigned him to supervise visits between parents going through divorce proceedings. He usually charged $50 an hour for the visits, but prosecutors alleged that he offered that the woman send nude photos of herself to him instead.

Prosecutors acknowledge that there were instances where the woman went along with Black’s messages. They say that while that may be true, Black is the one who is a sworn peace officer and held to a higher standard.

8:45 a.m.

Judge Austin Jackson has brought the jury into the courtroom. There are 7 total jurors: 6 jurors and one alternate.

The jury is made up of two white men, four white women, and one black woman.

Original Story

TYLER, Texas (KETK) – Smith County Precinct 2 Constable Joshua Black will begin his first of two trials this month Wednesday morning as he faces a felony count of official oppression.

Black is also charged on one count of misdemeanor prostitution and will also face a separate jury later this month on that charge. Monday morning was spent between 114th District Judge Austin Jackson and County Court at Law 2 Judge Taylor Heaton on which trial would proceed first.

Official oppression is typically classified as a Class A misdemeanor in Texas but can be upgraded to a third-degree felony in certain cases, which it was in Black’s.

In Texas, a law enforcement officer can be charged with official oppression under any of the following circumstances:

  • Intentionally subjecting another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful
  • Intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful
  • Intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment

It’s been unclear from pre-trial proceedings which of the circumstances Black is alleged to have violated.

Another twist was added in the case when he was arrested again last Friday for a separate indictment of prostitution, just three days before his first trial was scheduled to begin. Smith County District Attorney Jacob Putman said that the charge dealt with a separate victim than the first.

Under Texas law, the maximum penalty for a Class A misdemeanor in a fine of no more than $4,000 and/or a one-year sentence in county jail.

Black was appointed to be the Pct. 2 Constable back in 2018 when Andy Dunklin vacated his position to become the precinct’s Justice of the Peace. He ran unopposed in the 2020 election this week.

He holds an associate’s degree in criminal justice from TJC and graduated in 2007 from TJC’s 10th session Police Academy. He has completed training at The Bill Blackwood Law Enforcement Institute of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University for constables.

Black also served in the army component of the Texas State Guard, 2nd battalion 19th regiment, where he received the regimental commanders’ award.



Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/1st-of-two-trials-for-smith-county-constable-begins-wednesday-morning/feed/ 0
Dancing with the Stars season 30 premiere recap: LIVE BLOG https://ivideosgratis.org/dancing-with-the-stars-season-30-premiere-recap-live-blog/ https://ivideosgratis.org/dancing-with-the-stars-season-30-premiere-recap-live-blog/#respond Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:18:33 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/?p=246 The “Dancing with the Stars” season 30 premiere was Monday night, September 20. The show invited a new cast of 15 celebrities from the worlds of film, TV, music, sports, and social media. So who stood out as potential front-runners? Who seemed out of their depth? And who do you think will win the Mirror […]]]>

The “Dancing with the Stars” season 30 premiere was Monday night, September 20. The show invited a new cast of 15 celebrities from the worlds of film, TV, music, sports, and social media. So who stood out as potential front-runners? Who seemed out of their depth? And who do you think will win the Mirror Ball Trophy when all is said and done? Scroll down for our live blog with all the minute-by-minute developments and commentary throughout the night.

This year’s cast includes country singer Jimmie Allen, former Spice Girls singer Melanie C, “Bling Empire” star Christine Chiu, “Beverly Hills, 90210” alum Brian Austin Green, “The Office” actress Melora Hardin, social media star (and notorious college applicant) Olivia Jade, “Bachelor” star Matt James, “The Talk” co-host and Broadway performer Amanda Kloots, “Karate Kid” and “Cobra Kai” actor Martin Kove, Olympic gymnast Suni Lee, WWE pro wrestler Mike “The Miz” Mizanin, “Real Housewives” star Kenya Moore, Peloton fitness instructor Cody Rigsby, basketball player Iman Shumpert, and YouTube star and singer JoJo Siwa.

Of those, all eyes were on Siwa, who makes history as the first contestant to dance with a same-sex partner. And fresh off of winning the Olympic gold medal in the women’s all-around competition, Lee is hoping to follow in the “DWTS” gymnastic footsteps of past Mirror Ball champions Shawn Johnson and Laurie Hernandez. They and the rest of the cast are being scored by returning judges Carrie Ann Inaba and Bruno Tonioli, as well as Len Goodman, who’s back after having to sit out last season due to the COVID pandemic, and Derek Hough, who filled in for Goodman last year but is sticking around as a full-time panelist. Also back for season 30 is host Tyra Banks, who joined the cast last year after the surprise firing of Tom Bergeron and Erin Andrews.

Who are you rooting for this year? Follow along below as we dish the premiere episode. (Times listed below are Eastern.)

Jeffrey Kare, 8:00pm — Here we go for season 30!

Daniel Montgomery, 8:02pm — Nice retrospective intro clip package showing showing highlights from the last 29 seasons, followed of course by Tyra Banks in a gown made out of a Mirror Ball.

DM, 8:04pm — I hope the stars dance better with their partners than they do standing in place during that intro.

Melanie C and Gleb Savchenko (Cha Cha)

DM, 8:05pm — Mel C is teamed with Gleb. I have high hopes for this combination. Mel C looks like she’s still quite sporty, so I have a feeling she’ll be able to keep with the pace of this show.

JK, 8:07pm — What nice high energy to start off the season with.

DM, 8:07pm — Not a bad start for the Spice Girl, she seems top have the rhythm, strength, and posture to make it far in the competition if she can bring even more personality into the routines.

JUDGES — Len thought it was a “terrific” and “polished” performance with “great choreography.” Derek called it “clean” and “precise,” and Melanie has incredible leg lines. Bruno says, “Thank you for spicing up my life,” but she needs more pronounced hip action. Carrie Ann thought it was “clean,” though she could loosen up a bit.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (7), Derek (6), Bruno (7) = 27

JK, 8:10pm — Almost quadruple 7’s for the first score of the night.

The Miz and Witney Carson (Cha Cha)

DM, 8:11pm — Another highly promising combo of star and dancer. He’s got the personality, and she’s won the Mirror Ball Trophy before.

JK, 8:13pm — They’ve already got some slick moves down.

DM, 8:13pm — A little rough around the edges, but he’s not too bad with choreography for his first night out.

JUDGES — Derek was “surprised,” thought he would be “stiff,” but he had good flow. Bruno thought Witney “tamed the beast,” “light on his feet,” but “a bit flat-footed.” Carrie Ann thought he was “incredible” with “ridiculous” energy, though he hit some of the moves “too hard,” which made it a little awkward. Len thought it was “better than expected.”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 24

JK, 8:16pm — I think that’s a fair score for them.

DM, 8:16pm — A solid start in his scores too. I kinda thought the judges would be a little tougher with those numbers on night one, but I think those numbers were fair too.

Iman Sumpert and Daniella Karagach (Jive)

DM, 8:19pm — Always worried for a basketball player on this show. The height difference with their dance partners is always a struggle. Daniella even pointed it out the moment she meant him. And jive is a tough, fast-pace style for night one.

DM, 8:22pm — I’m very very surprised by how good that was. His timing was great!

JK, 8:23pm — That provided a ton of high bopping fun.

JUDGES — Bruno points out that it’s hard for a tall person to jive, but Iman was “nimble,” but he needs to work on his feet with the kicks and flicks, though it was a “great debut.” Carrie Ann thought it was “fly” and “ridiculous” (in a good way), “stylish” and “smooth.” Len thought it was “too casual, too loose,” and “the technique was poor.” Derek thought he looked “comfortable,” with issues with the content, but good for the first week.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (4), Derek (5), Bruno (5) = 21

DM, 8:24pm — Damn, that Len score was waaaaaay too low.

JK, 8:24pm — Agreed.

Olivia Jade and Val Chmerkovskiy (Salsa)

DM, 8:25pm — I’m not sure how I feel about the redemption narrative they’re aiming for with Olivia after the Operation Varsity Blues scandal, but the show gave her a damn lucky draw for her partner, one of the show’s top champions.

JK, 8:27pm — Controversy surrounding her aside, I thought Olivia managed to pull off such strong work with Val.

DM, 8:28pm — Another surprise. I think Olivia Jade is a contender for the win if she can get viewer support. A lot of content in that routine, and she pretty much nailed it, especially for week one.

JUDGES — Carrie Ann thought it was “well done” with “great lines” and “great legs.” Len wanted it to be “more spicy,” but it was “clean, clear, and polished.” Derek thinks she has so much potential as a performer, but she needs to “watch the shoulders” to show off her confidence. Bruno thinks she took to dancing “like a duck to water,” though he agreed it needed more spice.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 25

DM, 8:30pm — I kinda thought those scores would be a little higher, closer to what we saw from Melanie C.

JK, 8:30pm — Me too.

Jimmie Allen and Emma Slater (Tango)

DM, 8:33pm — He tells Emma he wants to “an ambassador for country music” and also wants to win. She won with Rashad Jennings, but I don’t have any clear early expectations for their chemistry as partners.

DM, 8:35pm — Not the most polished, but he was on the beat, had a lot of personalities, a promising start.

JK, 8:36pm — Almost outstanding!

JUDGES — Len didn’t think the dance suits Jimmie’s personality, but he’s got “great potential.” Derek thought he had an “incredible week one frame,” though he needs to work on being more “consistent.” Bruno thought he managed to “keep the tango on track.” It had good moments, but it was uneven. Carrie Ann thought it was a tough dance style with a lot of specificity, but it was a good first dance.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (5), Derek (6), Bruno (5) = 22

DM, 8:38pm — Those scores were fair for that dance.

Melora Hardin and Artem Chigvintsev (Tango)

DM, 8:43pm — She loved ballet as a child, so she has the potential to be bringing some prior skill to the show. And she thinks Artem smells good, so that’s a plus.

JK, 8:45pm — Alright performance. I think they both could definitely use some work.

DM, 8:45pm — Pretty decent start for Melora, she could clean it up some there.

JUDGES — Derek gives her a standing ovation, he was “blown away” and she had “light and shade.” Bruno thought she had “great lines, great placement,” but she lost balance from time to time. Carrie Ann thought she “brought the drama” and the “beautiful lines.” Len “liked it, no messing, no stressing … Well done.”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (6), Derek (7), Bruno (6) = 26

DM, 8:47pm — Interesting, I thought this dance would score a little lower, but I like Melora a lot, so I’m not mad at it.

DM, 8:49pm — I’m impressed that so far everyone tonight has been right on beat, no one really that messy. A solid group of dancers.

Suni Lee and Sasha Farber (Cha Cha)

DM, 8:50pm — “I wanted you so bad!” says Suni when she meets Sasha. He previously teamed with Simone Biles and Mary Lou Retton. I think this could be a great partnership, but Sasha notes that Suni is a little timid. Hopefully she can break out of her shell, but I think Sasha is a good partner to help her do that.

DM, 8:52pm — Solid from Suni. She’s got all the right moves, but she needs the energy and enthusiasm– Solid from Suni. She’s got all the right moves, but she needs the energy and enthusiasm.

JK, 8:53pm — Very lively and upbeat.

JUDGES — Bruno loved the flicks and kicks, but she mustn’t look at the floor. Carrie Ann thinks she’s “incredible” for Latin and ballroom dancing, but she needs to not prepare each move. It needs to look more flowing. Len felt it was “neat” and “precise,” but it needs to be more “free.” Derek suggests “a little less perfection and a little more expression.”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (7), Derek (7), Bruno (7) = 28

DM, 8:56pm — Highest score of the night so far, no surprise since she has that built-in gymnastics polish.

Cody Rigsby and Cheryl Burke (Tango)

DM, 8:59pm — Cody’s potential depends on his dance skills and how many audience members who don’t own Peloton bikes know who he is. He says he used to be a dancer, though, and he’s got the outsize personality that will help him gain new fans.

DM, 9:01pm — Not sure tango was an ideal dance from Cody. He looked a little awkward in hold.

JK, 9:02pm — It was at least physical.

JUDGES — Carrie Ann thought he was too “tight” and “taut” and needs to relax. Len thought he had “great presence” with “a lot of promise,” but he needs to keep his head up. But he’s “one to watch.” Derek felt he needed to “isolate the top half from the bottom half” for the ballroom routines. Bruno loved the “attitude.”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 24

DM, 9:03pm — Those numbers were a little higher than I expected. I thought we’d see a couple of 5s in there.

Amanda Kloots and Alan Bersten (Tango)

DM, 9:04pm — She was a Broadway performer for 17 years, so she’s going to have the dance skills, and I suspect fans will be on her side after her struggle this past year losing her husband Nick Cordero to COVID-19.

JK, 9:06pm — Amanda and Alan’s first performance — incredibly energetic!

DM, 9:07pm — Yep, she’s gonna be a big contender if she can bring those viewer votes in.

JUDGES — Len thought it “was full of tango content” with “attack” and “confidence.” Derek thought it was “unbelievable” with her “finesse” and “frame.” Bruno says, “You belong here. That was a beauty,” with a lot of “details in the interpretation.” Carrie Ann says, “You brought tears to my eyes.”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (7), Derek (7), Bruno (7) = 28

DM, 9:08pm — I have a feeling 7 is gonna be the ceiling for night one, which makes sense with the competition just started. I could see maybe JoJo tying Amanda and Suni at the top later tonight.

Martin Kove and Britt Stewart (Paso Doble)

DM, 9:12pm — I’ll admit, my expectations are pretty low for Martin Kove. Older celebrities have almost always had a tough time on the show, and 74 makes him even older than most. And Britt is a relatively new pro, so she doesn’t have her own established fan base.

DM, 9:15pm — Oh God bless Martin Kove, but that was not even the slightest bit good. He was very smart to open with that great “Karate Kid” speech. It gave the routine it’s only bit of excitement and personality. Otherwise, he mostly walked through it and stood in place.

JK, 9:16pm — Martin was clearly being upstaged by Britt.

JUDGES — Derek felt like Martin was “unprepared.” Bruno thinks he “needs to work on the content” and couldn’t tell what was coming next. Carrie Ann loved his commitment to dancing, but not so much the dancing. Len thought it was a “gallant effort” for someone in his 70s.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (4), Len (3), Derek (3), Bruno (3) = 13

JK, 9:17pm — And that’s not good for them to receive a score of 13 out of 40.

DM, 9:17pm — I wish I could say those scores were unfair, but they were actually quite right. But I too commend him for his commitment not just to character, but to the “DWTS” experience.

Kenya Moore and Brandon Armstrong (Foxtrot)

DM, 9:20pm — Can’t say I’ve ever had any interest in “Real Housewives” contenders, on or off the dance floor, and they haven’t typically done very well on this show, but Kenya already has good chemistry with Brandon. We’ll see how the dancing goes.

DM, 9:22pm — Good start for Kenya. That routine had good flow, soft movements. I’m not mad at it.

JK, 9:22pm — Lovingly poignant.

JUDGES — Bruno thought it was “classic” and “glossy” with a “luxurious sheen.” Carrie Ann thought she looked like a “queen,” and she has the “refinement” and “relaxed body,” plus the “right posture.” Len liked the “fluidity in the arms.” Derek thinks she has great potential, but she needs to watch the arms.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (7), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (7) = 26

DM, 9:25pm — I agree with the 6s for Kenya more than the 7s, but it was a good start for her.

Christine Chiu and Pasha Pashkov (Tango)

DM, 9:29pm — She asks to see Pasha’s abs the moment they meet. The “Bling Empire” star is excited to be dancing to “Glamorous” by Fergie. I’m skeptical about this pairing.

DM, 9:31pm — A very good start for Christine, not the most memorable routine of the night, but technically she has the goods.

JK, 9:31pm — I thought it definitely offered some class.

JUDGES — Carrie thinks she’s a “diamond in the rough” with a great back and great flexibility, but at little uneven. Len thought she had “great control,” but her feet “turned in a little bit” at times. Derek thought it was “really good” was great frame, but she needs to get lower into the ground. Bruno thinks she’s a “gem” who needs “a little bit more polish.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (7), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 25

DM, 9:34pm — I thought the 6s were pretty spot on, a little surprised Len gave it a 7.

JK, 9:34pm — That was clearly him being generous.

Matt James and Lindsay Arnold (Cha Cha)

DM, 9:36pm — No “Bachelor” contestant has done better than sixth place, but I think Matt is guaranteed to stay on for at least a few weeks with the massive Bachelor Nation fan base and Lindsay as he pro.

DM, 9:38pm — On the “Bachelor” scale, Matt is better than Grocery Store Joe, but still kinda middling, awkward, missed some steps.

JK, 9:39pm — Solid start for our (possible) champion of the season given how well other “Bachelor” alumni have done before.

JUDGES — Len thought the hip action was “lacking.” Derek thought he did a “great job” and was “charismatic,” but he needs to remember to turn out his feet. Bruno thought he “did deliver” with a “spontaneous quality” and good “stage presence.” Carrie Ann loved how he used the space, and she thought he aced the body rolls.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 24

DM, 9:41pm — Those 6s are actually way too high. No way he was better than Iman Shumpert or Jimmie Allen.

Brian Austin Green and Sharna Burgess (Foxtrot)

DM, 9:47pm — This should be interesting. Brian is dancing with his real-life girlfriend Sharna, so at least we know they already have chemistry … or at least for their sake I hope so.

Cordell Martin, 9:48pm — Brian and Sharna are adorable

JK, 9:49pm — They clearly work very well together.

DM, 9:50pm — Solid, but she was doing most of the work and showed him up for the most part.

CM, 9:51pm — I think Brian would be a lot worse with another pro.

JUDGES — Derek thought it was a “great job.” Bruno thought Brian was “Prince Charming out there.” Carrie Ann thought he was staring too much at Sharna and needs to perform more to the audience. Len didn’t think the feet were good, but he thinks this season’s competition is developing into something special.

SCORES — Carrie Ann (6), Len (6), Derek (6), Bruno (6) = 24

DM, 9:53pm — A lot of dancers bunching up in the middle of the leaderboard at 24 and 26 points. Some risk of getting lost in the shuffle with so many contestants in the competition.

CM, 9:54pm — Calling it now jojo will tie for first or be the leading scorer.

DM, 9:54pm — I think JoJo will tie, but not sure they’re gonna go to 8s tonight.

JK, 9:54pm — We’ll find out soon.

JoJo Siwa and Jenna Johnson (Quickstep)

DM, 9:55pm — They’re really playing up how historic it is to have same-sex dancers on the show. They won’t talk about why it took 30 seasons for it to happen when dancers of the same gender have performed together on “World of Dance” and “So You Think You Can Dance.” Welcome to the 21st century, “DWTS.” Better late than never.

DM, 9:57pm — Except for Jenna falling down, that was a fantastic routine, more exciting to see a same-gender routine than I even thought it would be, though JoJo needs to control her high energy a little more.

CM, 9:57pm — Yeah Jojo did her thing. Poor Jenna

JUDGES — Bruno loved to see their “freedom of expression” and praised their “recovery” from what JoJo is pretending was an intentional “dip.” Carrie credited JoJo with being a good partner. Len thought it lost a bit of control, but “what a performance.” Derek says, “You were born for ‘Dancing with the Stars.’”

SCORES — Carrie Ann (8), Len (7), Derek (7), Bruno (7) = 29

JK, 10:00pm — They at least still received the highest score of the night.

CM, 10:01pm — Told you guys.

DM, 10:01pm — Okay, I was wrong. I’m crying foul though for giving an 8 to the only dance of the night with an actual fall.

JUDGES’ LEADERBOARD

1. JoJo Siwa — 29
2. Amanda Kloots — 28
2. Suni Lee — 28
4. Melanie C — 27
5. Christine Chiu — 26
5. Melora Hardin — 26
5. Kenya Moore — 26
8. Olivia Jade — 25
9. Brian Austin Green — 24
9. Matt James — 24
9. Mike “The Miz” Mizanin — 24
9. Cody Rigsby — 24
13. Jimmie Allen — 22
14. Iman Shumpert — 21
15. Martin Kove — 13

CM, 10:05pm — Bottom two predictions?

JK, 10:06pm — I think Martin is absolutely going there.

CM, 10:06pm — I’m going with Martin and either Christine or Cody

DM, 10:06pm — Martin and Jimmie? Maybe Cody or Olivia who might not have fan bases and landed in the middle. Maybe Melora too because more than half the dancers ended up in the middle with either 26 or 24.

Be sure to make your predictions so that the contestants can see how they’re faring in our racetrack odds. You can keep changing your predictions until just before the next episode airs every Monday on ABC. You’ll compete to win a spot on our leaderboard and eternal bragging rights. See our contest rules and sound off with other fans in our reality TV forum. Read more Gold Derby entertainment news.


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/dancing-with-the-stars-season-30-premiere-recap-live-blog/feed/ 0
Student Blog: Reflections on Selected Musicals https://ivideosgratis.org/student-blog-reflections-on-selected-musicals/ https://ivideosgratis.org/student-blog-reflections-on-selected-musicals/#respond Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:09:31 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/?p=198 Back in my sophomore year in college, one of my assignments for music class other than studying site-reading was to write short reflections on musicals my professor wanted me to learn about or write about if I knew the show already. I enjoyed this so much because being the musical theater lover that I am, […]]]>

Back in my sophomore year in college, one of my assignments for music class other than studying site-reading was to write short reflections on musicals my professor wanted me to learn about or write about if I knew the show already. I enjoyed this so much because being the musical theater lover that I am, I had so much to express whether it is my feelings for a character or my interpretation on a song’s lyrics. I was instructed to write my reflection in this format: favorite character, song, actor/actress, and production. While many of the shows my teacher told me to listen to were ones I was familiar with, it brought me great joy to explore musicals I have yet to discover then. Here I will share selected parts of the reflections I wrote of different musicals, both new and old to me:

Cabaret

Favorite Character

In all honesty, I like the role of the Emcee the most. I find him to be the most exquisite among all the characters in the show and even among all the other musicals that I know. His character is quite ambiguous in a sense that one cannot be sure of his true sexuality: whether he is gay or a straight man with a flamboyant personality or he is just a very good actor. I like the fact that he has the power to keep his audience on their toes and that he is not one to disappoint. He is lively and he gives off that vibe without much effort. From the moment he walks on stage, he captures your attention simply because he can. It is with the help of his great charisma and presence that makes the cabaret such a success. I fell in love with his enthusiasm and that is why I aspire to follow after his footsteps.

The King and I

Favorite Song

My favorite song would be “Hello, Young Lovers”. I fell in love with this particular song because the lyrics are full of hope and happiness. Even though I have never been in love before, this song made me feel what it is to be in love. As Anna reminisces about her love story with Tom in the song, she does not have any sadness in her voice but rather she looks back at those memories with great affection and joy. Whenever I have the song on repeat, I can not help but feel blissful and it is such a wonderful thing to experience.

Favorite Production

In all honesty, the 1956 movie starring Yul Brynner and Deborah Kerr is my ultimate favorite version of the Rodgers & Hammerstein musical. I have a great fondness for this film because it is one of my first movie musicals I was exposed to as a child. The songs and the actors became a part of me at a very young age; it simply was a timeless classic and there could never be any other version that could replace this award-winning movie.

The Sound of Music

Favorite Song(s)
I am torn between these two songs: I Have Confidence and Something Good. I find The Confidence Song to be a very relatable song for everyone despite age, race, etc. In the beginning, you can hear Maria sing her thoughts out loud as she struggles with her doubts and fears; this part alone is a moment many people have to face in life. Eventually, she finds it in her to set aside her personal worries and just find her confidence in both sunshine and in the rain. I like the fact that in the song she says, “Strength doesn’t lie in numbers, strength doesn’t lie in wealth” because she is making it a point that you don’t need wealth or power to be confident but rather belief in one’s capabilities is all that matters. Overall, the song is a very uplifting song and I love going through the lyrics in my head during times of trouble, etc. just to remind myself that I can be as confident as Maria. Moving on, I also love Something Good because I find the lyrics to be very deep compared to the other songs of this musical. It makes me realize that despite my past mistakes and regrets, life will reward me one way or another for my good actions, however small they may be. This song wants people to know that there is hope for the hopeless for it is said that “what goes around comes around”.

Les Misérables

This musical has a very special place in my heart as well as The Phantom of the Opera and my other favorites. Les Misérables is a show which depicts the true essence of human suffering in a subtle way. There are those who may say that the show is very depressing but I believe that it is a play that sparks a sense of hope within the viewers and it is very evident as the story progresses. Yes, it takes place before and during the June Rebellion in France which depicts the evils of injustice, innocent blood being spilt, war and poverty but it does not necessarily mean that it is a story meant to stir sadness and sorrow in the hearts of the audience. I consider this musical to be one of the greatest of all time not just because it is one of the longest running productions of all time besides Andrew Lloyd Webber‘s Phantom, but rather because it celebrates the gift of the human spirit and its true power. Such a performance has moved millions of people around the globe therefore determining how impactful this show is to many. It merely reinforces the idea that through perseverance and faith, anything is possible.

Favorite actor/actress

I would have to say that Philip Quest is my favorite actor for this musical. He is by far the most convincing actor to play the role of Javert. Just by watching his performance of “Stars” from the 10th Anniversary Concert on YouTube takes my breath away everytime, I am not even exaggerating. Whenever I hear his voice, I can picture him standing before me and I feel all the emotions rush in me all at once which therefore shows how wonderful an actor and singer he is. He is acclaimed to be a winner of three Laurence Olivier Awards which is the most to date for any actor.

Favorite Production

I have had the privilege of watching Les Misérables live twice: one in London and one here in Manila. I would have to say that my favorite would be the recent staging of the show which was the one that took place in Manila a few years ago. I have to mention that the London staging of the show was following after the original production of the entire musical. Overall, it was still very impressive how they had a huge prop/machine which turned into the streets of Paris in one scene and then into the barricade and back into what was supposed to be the streets/ square in Paris. However, when I saw the production of the musical held here, I did not expect much based on what I viewed in the London production. Oh, how I was so wrong. They added literal buildings on stage right and left during the scene when Valjean was searching for work after being released from prison and even in the scene of “On My Own“, etc. It was as though the movie came to life on stage. They obviously upped their game after the 25th anniversary of the show and I must say they did a fantastic job at it. I was thoroughly impressed by the huge improvement from the original set design to the newest one.

Student Blog: Reflections on Selected MusicalsThe Lion King

From the moment Rafiki sings the first note and as the brilliant African sun begins to ascend in the background, all of my emotions from excitement to wonder starts to overflow inside of me and I find myself in tears (my mom thought that I had sipon but I told her that I was just happily crying my feelings out). I remember very clearly how I felt when the opening scene started to take place before my eyes. I couldn’t help but hold back the sudden surge to cry tears of joy as I witnessed something so wonderful and magical at that very moment. I definitely did not expect that to be my initial reaction but I am glad that I can look back knowing that I was automatically touched and emotionally involved from the very beginning of this phenomenal musical.

It is explicitly an unforgettable musical for many reasons that I will not be able to enumerate for there are a great number of them. The entire show highlighted the culture and beauty of Africa and therefore successfully stirred the desire of someone such as myself to want to visit the great continent. In short, it is a celebration of Africa. One would have to say that the entire show’s score defined what the show is all about. They put emphasis on the use of instruments originating from Africa as well as the use of a number of dialects of its people which fascinated me immediately. Moving on, the costumes and set design were just phenomenal. Having an eye for detail, I closely observed how the contraptions were designed for the tails of the lions, the prancing gazelles, the bodies of the hyenas, etc. By far, this production is one of the greatest that there ever can be in the history of musical theater. How everything was conceptualized continues to boggle my brain and it has been almost a year since I have seen the show for the first time

Favorite Song(s)

My favorite song would have to be They Live in You. I did not know this song ever existed until I watched the show live. I thought that the songs in the musical would just be the ones from the cartoon but it turned out that additions were made which resulted in making the musical even more wonderful. They have done the same thing with Disney Broadway shows such as Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin wherein they included more songs such as “Home” and “A Million Miles Away“, respectively.

I remember the scene when Mufasa sang this song to Simba as they were surrounded with endless beauty under the light of the stars. I find it to be a very meaningful song as it tells us that even if we have family members who are gone, they shall serve as our guardians and it is through them that we may be able to hold on to faith and hope. What touched me the most from this part was that it was a beautiful son and father moment. I couldn’t help but feel emotional at that very moment because I related to it as daughter for I am blessed with a loving father like Mufasa who has the wisdom and patience to help me learn to have hope and to keep true to myself.

I have to add that Endless Night is another favorite of mine. It is a beautiful song and I couldn’t help but mention it. This is a song in which any lost soul can relate to for there are times when we feel alone and confused. Simba cries out to his father as he tries to hold on to faith in his father and in himself making this song a tear-jerking kind.

Another song that I love would be the Grasslands Chant. Whenever I listen to this song, I feel as though I am being transported to the fields of Africa and I could imagine hearing the animals in the distance as the wind breezes through the tall grass. It is an enchanting song and I see it as a lullaby from the African wilderness.

A Chorus Line

Favorite Song(s)

I quite enjoy “Nothing” a lot. It appeals to someone like me because it describes the struggle of learning how to become a good actor. There are times when it becomes difficult to get certain skills such as improvisation mastered. In the case of Morales, she could not find it in her to use her imagination to picture herself on a snow sled or melt like an ice cream. She is an example of many who see a lesson such as improvisation to be challenging and seemingly not even necessary or in her own opinion, stupid. I appreciate the idea that the song is giving listeners an insight to the world of acting from a beginner’s perspective. It is definitely a fun song and I love how it makes me smile whenever I listen to it. This is a song that I would love to sing because I feel a connection with the lyrics and the music. I am so glad that it is through listening to this musical that I now know a new song that I have grown to like a lot.

Another song that I would like to take note of is “Dance: 10, Looks: 3″. I feel the need to mention this song because of its message coming from the lyrics. Initially, I did not like the song because I felt as though it was openly objectifying female performers. However, I eventually came to realize the value of the song after watching a clip from the movie version of the show online and by re-listening the song a number of times over. This song gives the idea that life as a performer is not at all blissful and easy for it is very demanding work to be in as it is the industry of the performing arts. This field is perceived to be heavily based on cut-throat competition because everyone wants to make it into the limelight, but not just anyone can accomplish that with a snap of the finger. In this song, Val explains how physical assets play an important role in the overall package of any performer such as a dancer and actress in her case. She not only needs to know how to dance flawlessly but also that she has to have good physical attributes. In a sense, it is through this song that shows how shallow things are in terms of judging a person not just in the arts but also in life in general. People are easily viewed based on looks rather than everything else which is very disquieting to many. The message of this song reaffirms the concept of how people automatically base their opinions off of appearance rather than delving in deeper because it is the first thing people notice about one another; many do not want to make the effort to discover more about a person because it is may be a waste of time for them.

While I have many other reflections, I hope that this may inspire you to take a look into the musicals I have mentioned in this article. You never know, maybe you will get hooked with a new musical or perhaps just a song or two! The ultimate goal of this blog was for me to simply share my appreciation and love for the beauty and hope that these songs, actors, stories, and shows have and give to me and countless others.


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/student-blog-reflections-on-selected-musicals/feed/ 0
A local queer, photographer shaking up the system through portraits | Blog https://ivideosgratis.org/a-local-queer-photographer-shaking-up-the-system-through-portraits-blog/ https://ivideosgratis.org/a-local-queer-photographer-shaking-up-the-system-through-portraits-blog/#respond Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:35:21 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/a-local-queer-photographer-shaking-up-the-system-through-portraits-blog/ As a kid, I was super rambunctious, I always talked and I messed up. Everything for which I was reprimanded and forced to read books like The Ladies’ Etiquette Book and Politeness Manual. Turns out I just had undiagnosed ADHD, and it’s a real problem how little support girls get for it compared to boys. […]]]>

As a kid, I was super rambunctious, I always talked and I messed up. Everything for which I was reprimanded and forced to read books like The Ladies’ Etiquette Book and Politeness Manual. Turns out I just had undiagnosed ADHD, and it’s a real problem how little support girls get for it compared to boys. I am a tall, somewhat chaotic, passionate woman. In other words, I can be a lot. It took me until I was 20 to start feeling good about myself. It matched my awareness that I was bi, suddenly so many things made a lot more sense. I’ve been through a few iterations of the woman, from a tomboy as a kid to a woman in my early twenties, but now I really feel right at home in a more feminine, non-binary world. My curvy body has always been a bit at odds with my identity, but now that I like to oscillate between male and female styles, I feel great!

It was an entirely weird shoot from start to finish, right? How did you do this?

It ended up being queer, which is still my personal goal. The more queers, the better! I slipped into Matthew’s dm’s because I was a fan of his work. I knew he was part of the Alphabet Mafia, and we were lucky to pick Noah for his looks. I’ve been asking model agencies for their BIPOC, queer, trans and non-binary models for years, and it’s exciting to see that they are starting to meet the demand.


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/a-local-queer-photographer-shaking-up-the-system-through-portraits-blog/feed/ 0
‘Let the Doctors Decide’ – UK Human Rights Blog https://ivideosgratis.org/let-the-doctors-decide-uk-human-rights-blog/ https://ivideosgratis.org/let-the-doctors-decide-uk-human-rights-blog/#respond Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:59:06 +0000 https://ivideosgratis.org/let-the-doctors-decide-uk-human-rights-blog/ September 27, 2021 by Marina Wheeler QC The appeal from Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust has been upheld. Picture: The Guardian In Bell and A v Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust and others [2021] EWCA Civ 1363 the Court of Appeal advised judges to avoid formulating policies in an area of ​​social and moral complexity. […]]]>

September 27, 2021 by Marina Wheeler QC

The appeal from Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust has been upheld. Picture: The Guardian

In Bell and A v Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust and others [2021] EWCA Civ 1363 the Court of Appeal advised judges to avoid formulating policies in an area of ​​social and moral complexity.

Since the Divisional Court restricted the medical treatment of children with gender dysphoria late last year (see R (at the request of Bell and A) c Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust and others), discussed on this blog here), the decision sparked a heated debate. Some have deplored the distress of young patients deprived of treatment. Others applauded the limits which they said would prevent irreparable damage. On September 17, 2021, the Court of Appeal overturned the decision, but litigation will continue to rage both inside and outside the courts.

The first claimant, Keira Bell, is a former Tavistock patient who was prescribed puberty inhibitors at 16 to delay the onset of female sex characteristics. She switched to a man using cross-sex hormones, had a double mastectomy, then changed her mind, regretting the “headstrong decision” which she said would negatively affect the rest of her life. His case – accepted by the Divisional Court – was that the “innovative” and “experimental” nature of the treatment, particularly the use of puberty blockers, made it unlikely that a child could validly consent to it.

The current consent law, set out in the leading case Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority [1986], considers that a child can validly consent to a treatment if he has sufficient maturity and intelligence to fully understand what is proposed (called “Gillick skill”).

The Divisional Court of Bell did not find the prescribing of puberty blockers unlawful in the absence of a court order and rejected the claimants’ argument that the treatment information provided to potential beneficiaries was misleading or inadequate. However, she was not convinced of the children’s ability to understand and assess the information and thereby give valid and informed consent.

Relevant information, the Divisional Court said, would include “the fact that the vast majority of patients taking puberty-blocking drugs switch to cross-sex hormones,” that these can lead to loss of fertility and function. sexual, and that the evidence base because this treatment is “still very uncertain”. There was no age-appropriate way to explain this, the court said. As a result, it was “highly unlikely” that a child under 13 would be able to give consent and it is highly doubtful that a 14 or 15-year-old could. Young people between the ages of 16 and 18 are presumed fit, but if there is any doubt that treatment is in their best interests, court authorization would be desirable. In practice, the Court of Appeal noted, this statement as interpreted by clinicians as a requirement to obtain court leave to treat.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and dismissed the application for judicial review, declaring that the lower court was not permitted to issue a declaration and directions in circumstances where it did not find illegality. Advisory statements were known but not, he said, when an allegation of illegality had failed. The lower court had also placed an “inappropriate restriction” on Gillick’s proficiency test by departing from the principle that children under 16 could make their own decisions if deemed competent by their treating clinicians.

In essence, the Court of Appeal considered that the lower judges had put themselves in the place of the clinicians: it is “for the doctors to decide the competence, not for the judges”.

It’s a matter of clinical judgment, the court said, tailored to the patient in question, how to explain things to ensure that consent is sufficiently informed. The statement, however, came close to “a checklist or script that clinicians are required to adopt for the indefinite future.”

Some of the factors included were statements of disputed fact, others “raise questions to which different clinicians would give different answers”. In other words, the statement was problematic because of its rigidity but also because it covered areas of contested fact, expert evidence and medical opinions and “implied factual findings that the Divisional Court was not. not empowered to do ”.

The Divisional Court had explicitly declared that it was not for “the court to judge the weight to be given to the various experts”. He also remembered (rightly the Court of Appeal) that his role was not to “determine clinical disagreements between experts on the effectiveness of treatment”. It was for the NHS and regulators. But despite these statements, the Divisional Court made make factual findings and seek to resolve clinical disputes by ruling that:

  1. the treatment was experimental (in the sense that its long-term consequences are not clear); and
  2. the “vast majority” of patients prescribed puberty inhibitors subsequently received cross-sex hormones.

It was inadmissible, according to the Court of Appeal. “Judicial review,” he said, “is not the forum for resolving contested questions of fact, causation and clinical judgment” and the court erred in deciding between competing expert evidence without being properly admitted or tested on cross-examination.

The evidence from the Tavistock Clinic (and the trusts the patients were referred to) was that the treatment was safe, internationally approved, reversible, and went through a rigorous evaluation process. Maintaining the statement would require clinicians to withhold or temper their clinical judgment and rely on “what amounts to the clinical judgment of the court” when deciding whether a child can validly consent to treatment.

The court also said the guidelines were “insufficiently sensitive to the role of parents in consent”. On this point, the Court referred with approval to the decision of Judge Lieven in AB vs. CD [2021] (a few months after the judgment of the Divisional Court, to which she contributed). In that case, she ruled that unless parents override the child’s wishes, they could consent on behalf of the child to puberty blockers without the need for a best interests claim. with the court. Children may have difficulty understanding the consequences of treatment, it has been said, but not their parents.

Throughout the judgment, in various ways, the Court has insisted on judicial deference. Controversial ethical issues that attract polarized opinions “are best assessed in a regulatory and academic setting and not through litigation,” he said. Moreover, as Lord Philips advised in R (Burke) v General Medical Council [2005]Courts should avoid expressing opinions in areas of social and ethical controversy when there is no specific issue to be resolved between the parties. The Divisional Court of Bell fell into this error.

The conclusion of the Court of Appeal was clear: court applications may be appropriate in specific and difficult cases, but it was wrong to give guidance to clinicians as to when such circumstances may arise. That said, the shutdown ends with its own word of caution. Clinicians will inevitably “take great care” before recommending treatment to a child, the court said, and will be “astute in ensuring” that consent is properly informed by the pros and cons of the proposed treatment in light of “the evolution of research” and all long life. consequences in the long term that it may have.

Somewhat disturbingly, he goes on to warn: “[C]physicians will be aware of the possibility of regulatory or civil action where, in individual cases, problems can be tested ”and, in this vein, notes a report by the Care Quality Commission from January 2021 critical of the aspects obtaining consent at the Tavistock clinic.

Regardless of the outcome (and leaving aside the prospect of another appeal), Ms. Bell’s litigation has brought to light a controversial and complex area of ​​medical practice. As the figures presented to the Court show, the treatment of gender dysphoria in children is increasing: in 2009 there were 97 referrals to the Tavistock clinic; in 2019, there were 2,519. Given these numbers, Ms. Bell is unlikely to be the only young person to have changed her mind about treatment. If this is true, a clinical negligence claim is only a matter of time. Unlike judicial review procedures, this will provide a forum where the court is required to draw factual conclusions, make judgments on clinical practice, and resolve disputes between experts. On this occasion, the judges will have to decide.

Marina Wheeler QC is a lawyer at 1 Crown Office Row.

Jeremy Hyam QC, Alasdair Henderson and Cafe Darragh, also of 1 Crown Office Row, received instructions from the Plaintiffs / Respondents in this matter.


Source link

]]>
https://ivideosgratis.org/let-the-doctors-decide-uk-human-rights-blog/feed/ 0