Coal Advocate Keith Pitt Gets Salary Increase and Cabinet Position Through Quota
The next time liberals or nationals share their horror about the idea of ’quotas’ to support women in leadership, think (again) about the role quotas play in the nationals’ grip on power in the country. Australia.
On the one hand, they are already getting a deputy prime minister as part of their coalition deal with the Morrison government. The deserving Barnaby Joyce holds the post, a man whose most recent antics include the claim that his party will not be “held hostage” to climate action in Australia. He also became a quota on the Women’s Working Group, which was very disgusted earlier this year, given that he had previously stepped down from the leadership of Nationals due to an allegation of sexual harassment. credible and still unresolved (which he denies).
No, they don’t have another quota feather in the cap, this time with Keith Pitt (re) raised to Cabinet, as part of the huge price Australia will pay nationals for their support of signing the net zero target by 2050, the absolute bare minimum that Australia can bring to the COP 26 summit in Glasgow next week. This deal means that the Nationals again have a five-member cabinet quota.
Pitt takes his reward (which includes a raise in salary), despite being fiercely against the net zero commitment and despite being one of the nation’s most vocal climate deniers and coal advocates. Last week, when ABC Radio National’s Fran Kelly repeatedly asked Pitt if he believed in climate change, he replied, “the climate has always changed Fran” and went on to say that Australia cannot. not make an “iota” of difference.
It seems that Pitt reserves his ambition for other causes. Last month, he campaigned for the fossil fuel sector to receive a new $ 250 billion taxpayer-funded loan. He’s no fan of renewables, telling the house to “find me a solar panel that works in the dark”, failing to acknowledge the existence of batteries.
He was one of the main men (and predominantly men) to hold Australia back in climate action, contributing to global glacial progress that ultimately put our children’s future in jeopardy. and grandchildren. Pitt and his group of Nationals critics also failed to see the business opportunity to move to a greener economy, risking Australia’s ability to participate in the most competitive way in a low-carbon global economy. They claim to protect regional Australia as regional Australia seems to have the most to lose in a warming Australia. And they claim to protect jobs and economic interests while ignoring the opportunities for positioning the economy for the future.
As the Australia Institute points out today, modeling from Deloitte Access Economics reveals that a 46% reduction in emissions by 2030 would result in economic benefits of $ 210 billion.
But we won’t, not with Pitt, Joyce, Christensen and their friends dictating the terms. Instead, the nationals will be “compensated” for signing the bare minimum, knowing full well that Australia is losing because they are winning in these negotiations.
Now imagine, just a moment, where we would be if we had quotas for women. Instead of quotas for Nationals.