Fifa awaits its position on the suspension of Zifa Exco

[ad_1]

The Chronicle

Sikhumbuzo Moyo, senior sports journalist

Fifa decided to wait and see the development of football in the country which saw the Sports and Recreation Commission flex its muscles and slap the entire Zifa executive committee with a suspension.

The bold move by the SRC board chaired by Gerald Mlotshwa was taken on Tuesday as the sports supreme body finally cracked the whip on Zifa’s blunder, which analysts say was long overdue. because the national football association now behaved as if it was above the dictates of the SRC Law.

Responding to Chronicle Sport’s inquiries about the consequences of the SRC’s decision to suspend the executive committee headed by Felton Kamambo, particularly on whether a ban on international football is looming for Zimbabwe, Fifa said that she was keeping an eagle eye on developments but could not give an overall position at the moment.

“Fifa is closely following this affair. Please understand that we cannot comment further at this point, ”Fifa said in their email response on Friday morning.

The suspension of Zifa’s executive committee has divided opinion among football fans in the country with those supporting the SRC saying it was the right decision while Zifa’s infantrymen lambasted the Commission arguing that the decision would lead to a definitive ban by Fifa. , citing recent developments in Kenya.

However, the Kenyan situation parallels that of Zimbabwe as the CBC never asked Zifa accounts to verify how Fifa money was being used, but instead asked Zifa to account for public funds in accordance with its role. monitoring as enshrined in the SRC law. In fact, the SRC law authorizes the Commission to deregister any national sports association that does not meet the requirements of the law.

The CBC said this was the basis for the suspension, although it was Zifa’s other many transgressions, such as breaching COVID-19 protocols, constitutional delinquency and failing to respond to allegations of sexual harassment.

[ad_2]
Source link

Comments are closed.