Mormon Church contradicts own stance on marriage, supports sweeping marriage redefinition bill

[ad_1]

Yesterday the Mormon Church announced, in stark contrast to its fully stated beliefs on marriage, its public support for the misnamed “Respect for Marriage Act”. Same The Salt Lake Grandstand called it “an amazing move.”

The Mormon Church’s official statement on this decision begins by proudly declaring its historic and well-known belief about marriage: “The doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints regarding marriage between a man and a woman is well known. and will remain unchanged.

Even still, Mormon leaders said this bill codifying the sweeping redefinition of marriage into U.S. law while going further than the Supreme Court did in Oberfelfell versus Hodges, “is the way forward” to “healing relationships and fostering better understanding”.

This is a dramatic surrender of the Mormon Church for political and public relations purposes.

Dr. Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and former board member of Focus on the Family, said the decision “comes down to an essentially unconditional surrender” by this church on one of the most public issues. most important of the hour. He adds that Mormons “decided they weren’t going to fight the issue of same-sex marriage in terms of its legal status. Rather, they will draw a new frontier” regarding what they are willing to stand up for and defend.

Dr. Mohler explains, “Joseph Smith himself taught that the Constitution of the United States of America was divinely inspired. It’s something you won’t find in historical Christianity. This fact is not without significant influence on Mormon theology of course and how it engages American law. Mohler adds that according to the Mormon understanding, “the Constitution of the United States, if divinely inspired, well, it is also reviewable or changeable, and that indicates the Mormon understanding of revelation.”

Of course, the Mormon Church has a dramatic history when it comes to marriage and how their beliefs align or conflict with American law.

In order for their historic territory to officially become the state of Utah, the Mormons were forced to enact a new prophetic revelation banning polygamy, which they had previously endorsed and practiced.

This change was enacted because the United States Supreme Court upheld the Edmunds-Tucker Act which outlawed polygamy and guaranteed the federal government’s right to seize all church property as long as Mormons held to the plural marriage. The church quickly changed its official doctrine on polygamy in 1890 thanks to a new “Manifesto” from Mormon church president Wilford Woodruff.

In this manifesto, Woodruff said,

To the extent that laws have been enacted by Congress prohibiting plural marriages, which laws have been declared constitutional by the court of last resort, I hereby declare my intention to submit to such laws and to use my influence to the members of the Church over whom I preside to do the same.

And the Mormon Church has sworn and been very conscious to abide by US marriage law ever since. Which brings us to this present moment.

Senator Mitt Romney, famous for his ties to the Church, said he was now one of the few Republican senators willing to vote for the troubling bill. Utah Sen. Mike Lee said he plans to vote against the law.

All four US congressmen from Utah voted to codify the redefinition of marriage into federal law in July.

This deeply pernicious law, now supported by the Mormon Church, will do the following,

  1. Require the federal government to recognize almost all definitions of marriage that any other state recognizes (such as plural marriages or even marriages involving a minor or parent) with one exception. Although the federal government is not required to recognize marriages involving three or more people, new amendments will still require the federal government to recognize polygamous relationships when a person is married to multiple partners.
  2. Activists will have the right to sue individuals, organizations and religious businesses that adhere to a sincere religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman.
  3. The IRS could use this bill to remove the tax-exempt status of nonprofit religious organizations that believe in natural marriage.

Dr. Mohler correctly observes the pitfalls the Mormon Church has now entered with his new announcement,

Interestingly, Mormon authorities have made positive progress in negotiations with LGBTQ activist groups, trying to find some kind of common ground, but this common ground does not actually respect religious freedom, as the LDS authorities claim.

Related articles and resources:

Contact Your Senators: Proposed ‘Amendment’ to ‘Respect for Marriage Act’ Doesn’t Address Religious Freedom Issues

Help protect traditional marriage and people of faith – Oppose the so-called “respect for marriage law”

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the Trans Issue and Gender Redefinition

How the question of “trans” and the redefinition of gender attacks the family

Yes, sexuality and gender are undeniable gospel issues

How to Teach Your Kids About Marriage – Creative and Practical Ideas

Raising Children Who Honor Marriage: What You Need to Know

Photo by Getty.

[ad_2]
Source link

Comments are closed.